Blogoforum - blog+forum on astronomy and science http://blogoforum.com/tag/astronomy+science Talk about astronomy and science Proof : Light Speed isn't Constant !! http://blogoforum.com/tag/astronomy+astrophysics+einstein+evolution+relativity+science/proof-light-speed-isn-t-constant-4362.html Two stars glitter on the right and on the left. Facing stars, two mirrors are set at 45 degrees, and reflect star's lights to down. Speed of two reflected lights are always the same. Therefore, when two mirrors move together to right or left, wave length(looked from stand point of mirror) of two reflected lights may be changed. In other words, wave density(number of waves that stays within certain same length of light path) of reflected light is changed by mirror's motion. But how about incident light ? Wave density does not be changed by mirror's motion ! In short, wave density(number of waves that stays within certain same length from mirror) of reflected light and incident light are generally not the same. Constant light speed isn't able to explain above,I think. http://www.geocities.co.jp/Technopolis/2561/eng.html Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:58:29 GMT http://blogoforum.com/tag/astronomy+astrophysics+einstein+evolution+relativity+science/proof-light-speed-isn-t-constant-4362.html RE: Big Bang - Common Misconceptions by Jon Voisey http://blogoforum.com/tag/astronomy+link+science/re-big-bang-common-misconceptions-by-jon-voisey-3920.html And I thought there may have been a few rational Xians around. Will try to remember next time. - 1 reply Mon, 09 Oct 2006 18:33:19 GMT http://blogoforum.com/tag/astronomy+link+science/re-big-bang-common-misconceptions-by-jon-voisey-3920.html RE: Big Bang - Common Misconceptions by Jon Voisey http://blogoforum.com/tag/astronomy+link+science/re-big-bang-common-misconceptions-by-jon-voisey-3504.html The Big Bang, for information in real science didn't ever occur as the so-called experts have spouted in their false science. The real science is that the universe uses a system of two huge energy bubbles, which is factually seen in NASA pictures of the Bubble Nebula (and which is factually one of two charged energy bubbles in a galaxy location (Milky Way this time), and the oppositely cahrged bubbles then streak through space by the magnetic attraction between them, and hit head-on together. These collisions are seen in endless Hubble and other pictures where the people viewing the collisions are spouting their slop-theories about all kinds of other junk. Junk that quantum mechanics garbage is making up eneough dimensions and other slop to make their so-called theories stick to any walls. The bubble collisions result in two, opposite explosions taht blast ultra-hot material out into space for new galaxies and other objects. Neutron stars are formed at the collision point, as are stars, planets and moons inside galaxies. And, the accretion slop spouted for star and planet formation is all total garbage, simply because the Little Bangs decribed briefly here are the way every single object in the universe is made instead of the farcical Big Bang. This is fact, and I also know EXACTLY the real science as to how "matter" in the universe is scientifically made from absolutely nothing. And, for information, the Einstein total slop of E=mc^2 is proven to be factually wrong by science and math, so the E=mc^2 slop is NOT involved or true at all. - 1 reply Fri, 06 Oct 2006 23:09:21 GMT http://blogoforum.com/tag/astronomy+link+science/re-big-bang-common-misconceptions-by-jon-voisey-3504.html Ignorance in science http://blogoforum.com/tag/astronomy+astrophysics+einstein+evolution+relativity+science/ignorance-in-science-3492.html It is science FACT that evolution is scientifically impossible, and undeniably proven by science to factually be that situation. And, I challenge any and all so-called scientists who think they can stand up in their so-called proof of the evolution slop. I also challenge ANYONE who wants to also go down in flames concerning astropghysics, physics, Einstein slop, which is also now proven to be factually all wrong and his total slop completely all slop, and quantum mechanics garbage as well. So, the best-of-the-farcical-best, bring on your slop-science and you will be going down in flames in the end. If you think I am kidding - TRY ME. And, I just so happen to be a born-again, bible-believing Christian who is fully able and factually going to cram real physics and science fact down the throat of anyone who wants to step up to the plate here. - 2 replies Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:53:16 GMT http://blogoforum.com/tag/astronomy+astrophysics+einstein+evolution+relativity+science/ignorance-in-science-3492.html RE: Ignorance in science http://blogoforum.com/tag/astronomy+astrophysics+einstein+evolution+imaginary+relativity+science/re-ignorance-in-science-3528.html I also want to add that I refuse to use the imaginary numbers -- because they simply don't exist! They are imaginary, aren't they? So all the differential equations, complex functions and all others are just bunch of crap! - 1 reply Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:26:48 GMT http://blogoforum.com/tag/astronomy+astrophysics+einstein+evolution+imaginary+relativity+science/re-ignorance-in-science-3528.html Big Bang - Common Misconceptions by Jon Voisey http://blogoforum.com/tag/astronomy+link+science/big-bang-common-misconceptions-by-jon-voisey-2660.html Jon Voisey - Astronomy major - posted <a href="http://angryastronomer.blogspot.com/2006/07/big-bang-common-misconceptions.html">The Big Bang - Common Misconceptions</a> - interesting astronomy article understandable by non-scientists. Jon tells us that the Big Bang wasn't actually a bang and that Big Bang theory can live in peace with belief in God. - 1 reply Wed, 20 Sep 2006 11:45:01 GMT http://blogoforum.com/tag/astronomy+link+science/big-bang-common-misconceptions-by-jon-voisey-2660.html